Posts Tagged ‘IBM CFO’

Is Cloud really the King?

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

Before I even start, I would like to take a moment to appreciate the creativity of the person who coined the term, “Cloud Computing”. I can’t be sure about the person who came up with it, since there is still a debate on it, but to my knowledge it is Eric Schmidt of Google. So kudos to you Mr. Schmidt for giving the world a term that is so empowering. However, the big discussion is  – Is cloud useful ?

In the recent past it seemed that the most tragic shadow: security concern would obliterate the acceptance of Cloud Computing but with technology constantly reaching new heights, it seems security would be no fuss in the near future and companies would step forward to benefit from the quintessential features of Cloud Computing. The best being the ability to cut IT spend, which today is one of the most essential requirement for growth. In fact during the IBM Impact 2010, conference held in Mumbai, Craig Hayman, GM AIM brand, IBM in his key note speech also said, “In today’s environment it’s all about working smart and the first step towards working smart is to reduce the total spend on IT”.

Midst all discussion regarding risk factor related with Cloud, I came across this interesting article published in cfo.com, titled Certainties: Death, Taxes, and the Cloud. In the write-up Michael Hugos, a former chief information officer and a principal of the Centre for Systems Innovation asserts that cloud can decrease key risks. Giving an example, he said “for a company developing a new product with an uncertain long-term market, renting the associated computing capacity is far less risky than expanding the company’s data centre. The cloud provides a lot of flexibility to probe into new markets, ride them as far as they go, and exit without a bunch of sunk cost,” and I completely agree with his statement.

So it’s quite clear that risk is not the concern factor, so then what’s it? On this, I assume most of the IT evangelist would have the same thought as I do, that is “vendor lock-in”. The vision of being fully reliable on a single service supplier is objectionable to companies that depend heavily on IT service. Red Hat CEO James Whitehurst was recently quoted in the computer world, saying that Cloud is the mother of all Lock-ins.

I would like to know what the Indian CFO community thinks about the plethora of discussion which Cloud initiates almost every day. Is it worth it, or the traditional way of maintaining private data centre is better? Does it make sense to maintain a huge data centre when it can be outsourced? Your suggestions are of ultimate importance and will enable us, the community to have a better approach. I look forward to hear from you.

Data Source/References/Quotes

CFO.com – Certainties: Death, Taxes, and the Cloud

Disclaimer
The views and opinions mentioned in this blog are strictly my own and in no way reflect those of IBM or any other corporation or individual in any manner

  • Share/Bookmark

Mergers and Acquisitions – The human side

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Very recently, I was going through an article in the UK CIO publication on Mergers & Acquisitions. I noted some interesting points:

  1. Global M&A activities are up by 18% compared to the first quarter of year 2009
  2. While financially well positioned organizations are taking advantage of the downturn to execute M&A deals, yet it is fraught with very high risk
  3. Research has shown that almost 70% of M&As fail to create expected shareholder value with integration being the dominant cause of value loss.
  4. Even among companies with successful M&A track records, three times as many cite integration as the most serious risk compared to issues of deal strategies and deal valuation.

While integration is definitely an issue and companies are today giving enormous focus on structure, systems and processes in M&A deals – perhaps some very important aspects are still not being given due regard. Soft issues like Organisation Culture, Employee motivation, Employee skills and many other soft people issues are perhaps not figuring as important agenda.

Most often, business leaders and deal teams are more focused on getting the deal closed. Integration teams tend to be more focused on getting the structures, systems and processes integrated. Beyond this, there is often not enough focus on how to actually make the deal work – and the key to making it work is about effectively integrating disparate cultures.

The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance has acknowledged the critical role of culture: “The primary reason that cultural differences, if not uncovered and addressed, can affect the value of the deal is that cultural differences often spell decreased productivity, which leads to lower revenues and income, and hence the combined entity may be worth less than expected.”

Coming to the human issues – Dealmakers have begun to realize that paying attention to people after the deal closes is perhaps too late. In the case of IT and BPO companies, the major component of the valuation would perhaps be on the people and their skills. It is said that in IT and BPO companies, their valuation becomes near zero when the employees go back home after work and again returns to market value when employees are back at work.

My two cents of thought on this is while there is an awareness among dealmakers on the soft issues, it becomes difficult for them to put these into practice as there are hardly any reliable processes or metrics to measure and manage the softer side of acquisition. I would be grateful for your views and thoughts and would invite you to please put in your comments on the blog. Lets see some discussions around this interesting topic.


Data Source/References/Quotes:

M&A revival presents new opportunities and risks for organisations, CIO UK (White paper)

“The impact of Culture on M&A”  by Mercer, UK

Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance

Disclaimer

The views and opinions mentioned in this blog are strictly my own and in no way reflect those of IBM or any other corporation or individual in any manner

  • Share/Bookmark

Capitalising on complexities

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010
I remember sometime back when I shared the IBM global CFO report with you
all; I talked about how the global crisis last year brought CFO’s in the
spotlight and added a whole bunch of new responsibilities on their
shoulders. This time around I have the pleasure of sharing the newly
released IBM Global CEO report with you all. The report, unlike CFO study,
showcases the period of evolution, change, crisis, opportunity that a CEO
has been dealing with.
We all agree that the economic environment of year 2009 was a wake-up call.
As Mr Sam Palmisano, Chairman, MD & CEO, IBM says – It was just the latest
in a series of alerts that sounded during the first decade of this new
century. In a very short time, we’ve become aware of global climate change;
of the geopolitical issues surrounding energy and water supplies; of the
vulnerabilities of supply chains for food, medicine and even talent; and of
sobering threats to global security. The common denominator? The realities
— and challenges — of global integration.
We occupy a world that is connected on multiple dimensions, and at a deep
level — a global system of systems. That means, among other things, that it
is subject to systems-level failures, which require systems-level thinking
about the effectiveness of its physical and digital infrastructures. It is
this unprecedented level of interconnection and interdependency that
underpins the most important findings contained in this report. Inside this
revealing view into the agendas of global business and public sector
leaders, three widely shared perspectives stand in relief.
1. The world’s private and public sector leaders believe that a rapid
escalation of “complexity” is the biggest challenge confronting them. They
expect it to continue — indeed, to accelerate — in the coming years.
2. They are equally clear that their enterprises today are not equipped to
cope effectively with this complexity in the global environment.
3. Finally, they identify “creativity” as the single most important
leadership competency for enterprises seeking a path through this
complexity.
Events, threats and opportunities aren’t just coming at us faster or with
less predictability; they are converging and influencing each other to
create entirely unique situations. These firsts-of-their-kind developments
require unprecedented degrees of creativity — which has become a more
important leadership quality than attributes like management discipline,
rigor or operational acumen.
Hence as a CFO, I am thinking aloud on:
a. How do I capitalise on the new business complexities ? This needs
investments to not only manage but also benefit from it. As soon as I look
at it as a cost head, I have ceded ground to my competitors
b. Creativity can be defined more accurately by industry verticals –  For
e.g. we all know about the ongoing Euro crisis. Different industries will
have a different impact and the creativity to address this will be
different once again.
c. How do I ensure that my CEO has insights and understanding of the
finance organisation in the complex environment
I am keen to seek your views and comments on these.You may like to
download your own copy of the IBM CEO report  from
http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/ceo/ceostudy2010/index.html . I am sure
it will be a good read. This is the largest CEO study till date after
direct interviews with over 1500 CEOs across the globe.

I remember sometime back when I shared the IBM global CFO report with you all; I talked about how the global crisis last year brought CFO’s in the spotlight and added a whole bunch of new responsibilities on their shoulders. This time around I have the pleasure of sharing the newly released IBM Global CEO report with you all. The report, unlike CFO study, showcases the period of evolution, change, crisis, opportunity that a CEO has been dealing with.

We all agree that the economic environment of year 2009 was a wake-up call. As Mr Sam Palmisano, Chairman, MD & CEO, IBM says – It was just the latest in a series of alerts that sounded during the first decade of this new century. In a very short time, we’ve become aware of global climate change; of the geopolitical issues surrounding energy and water supplies; of the vulnerabilities of supply chains for food, medicine and even talent; and of sobering threats to global security. The common denominator? The realities — and challenges — of global integration.

We occupy a world that is connected on multiple dimensions, and at a deep level — a global system of systems. That means, among other things, that it is subject to systems-level failures, which require systems-level thinking about the effectiveness of its physical and digital infrastructures. It is this unprecedented level of interconnection and interdependency that underpins the most important findings contained in this report. Inside this revealing view into the agendas of global business and public sector leaders, three widely shared perspectives stand in relief.

1. The world’s private and public sector leaders believe that a rapid escalation of “complexity” is the biggest challenge confronting them. They expect it to continue — indeed, to accelerate — in the coming years.

2. They are equally clear that their enterprises today are not equipped to cope effectively with this complexity in the global environment.

3. Finally, they identify “creativity” as the single most important leadership competency for enterprises seeking a path through this complexity.

Events, threats and opportunities aren’t just coming at us faster or with less predictability; they are converging and influencing each other to create entirely unique situations. These firsts-of-their-kind developments require unprecedented degrees of creativity — which has become a more important leadership quality than attributes like management discipline, rigor or operational acumen.

Hence as a CFO, I am thinking aloud on:

a. How do I capitalise on the new business complexities ? This needs investments to not only manage but also benefit from it. As soon as I look at it as a cost head, I have ceded ground to my competitors

b. Creativity can be defined more accurately by industry verticals –  For e.g. we all know about the ongoing Euro crisis. Different industries will have a different impact and the creativity to address this will be different once again.

c. How do I ensure that my CEO has insights and understanding of the finance organisation in the complex environment

I am keen to seek your views and comments on these.You may like to download your own copy of the IBM CEO report  from here. I am sure it will be a good read. This is the largest CEO study till date after direct interviews with over 1500 CEOs across the globe.

Data Source/References/Quotes:

http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/ceo/ceostudy2010/index.html

Disclaimer

The views and opinions mentioned in this blog are strictly my own and in no way reflect those of IBM or any other corporation or individual in any manner

  • Share/Bookmark